Last week I accidentally watched the entire first
season of Castle in two days. I say
“accidentally” because I didn’t realize I was done until the disc threw me back
to the menu. And I guess I technically
didn’t watch the entire first season.
See, my new used DVD player is about ten years
old. It’s about the size of a VCR and has issues reading discs that are
anything less than pristine. Pretty much everything I get from the library has
to be washed in soap and water if I’m going to have a chance of getting through
it. The library should probably wave all my library fines in thanks for my hand
washing all of their discs.
Sadly, some of the Castle DVDs were too abused. I had to skip chapters and one entire
episode. Fortunately, the first six episodes were all written with the same
form and I always knew whodunit by the second commercial break. For the last
half of the season they cheated and the killer was always introduced so late in
the episode you had no chance of solving it first. Jessica Fletcher would not
approve.
If you’ve never heard of the show, Castle stars Malcolm Reynolds, who has
been sent back in time to Earth that Was circa 2009. Instead of finding a way
back to his spaceship to fight the Alliance, he decides to call himself Richard
Castle and become a best-selling crime novelist*. Just for fun, he finds a way
to follow around an attractive New York City homicide detective, making her the
basis for his latest fictional detective. But he really just wants to solve
murders and banter with everyone in sight. Honestly, it’s just another mystery
novel writer solves murders show that doesn’t really bring anything new to the
table.
Mystery writer or space cowboy? You be the judge. |
Better looking than every fictional writer after Angela Lansbury |
Good characters are hard to create. But clearly,
we value them in our stories more than the stories themselves.
*I may have made up that first part. But the
show’s a lot more interesting if you watch it that way.
So true! I maintain this is how Twilight became such a hit.
ReplyDeleteThis is why I've enjoyed watching Castle. I don't see how Twilight became popular because of it's characters. I think it became popular because of the situations they were in. Bella is one of the most shallow characters I've read.
ReplyDeleteYeah, there's something to be said for entertainment that's based on wish fulfillment. Characters can a little shallow if the audience is too busy wishing they were in their shoes to notice.
ReplyDeleteI don't think Bella's that shallow. Maybe you have to be a girl to understand her...
ReplyDeleteAlso, this is incidentally why the Harry Potter books are awesome, despite your claim that their world is unbelievable. :P
ReplyDeletePerhaps it's not that she's shallow, but that she's not terribly proactive... I'm not sure, it's been a couple of years since I read the book.
ReplyDeleteI've heard many girls call Bella shallow....
ReplyDeleteHer motivations are never strong, and the only reason she seemed drawn to Edward was for his physical appearance and for the mysterious quality about him. She seemed to completely ignore any sense of danger and it felt extremely false. Compared to Harry Potter, or even Katniss, there is nothing driving her. And I think non-active characters can be incredibly shallow.